Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study was to identify key psychosocial determinants of proactive environmental behavior among adolescents using a hierarchical model of predictors. The study was conducted on a convenience sample of N = 260 participants of both genders, aged 18 to 65 (M = 30.46, SD = 9.05). A hierarchical regression analysis in four steps was applied to examine the contribution of demographic factors (gender and age), subjective quality of life, anticipated pessimism, and environmental self-efficacy. The final model explains 31% of the variance in proactive environmental behavior. The introduction of environmental self-efficacy in the final step contributed an additional 19% of explained variance, distinguishing this variable as the strongest individual predictor (β = 0.29, p ≤ 0.01). Among demographic factors, gender showed a stable contribution (β = -0.20, p ≤ 0.05), while age demonstrated increasing significance (β = 0.18, p ≤ 0.05). Quality of life emerged as a stable positive predictor (β = 0.16, p ≤ 0.05), whereas anticipated pessimism showed a statistically negligible contribution (β = 0.03, p ≥ 0.05). The findings indicate that belief in one's own effectiveness (self-efficacy) is a significantly stronger driver of proactivity than environmental concern or pessimism about the future. The results emphasize the importance of strengthening personal psychological resources and well-being in promoting environmental activism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivanović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: