Key result
In a simulation model, pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin and apixaban had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £13,226 and £20,671 per QALY gained compared to clinically dosed warfarin.
Why the study?
Are pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin or new oral anticoagulants cost-effective compared to clinically dosed warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Are pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin or new oral anticoagulants cost-effective compared to clinically dosed warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Based on simulation modeling, apixaban appears to be the most cost-effective anticoagulation treatment for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation compared to pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban.
Unlikely cost-effective in Thailand; leaves open need for local evaluations before broader adoption.
Pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing is an alternative to standard clinical algorithms and new oral anticoagulants for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, clinical evidence for pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin dosing is limited to intermediary outcomes, and consequently, there is a lack of information on the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation treatment options. A clinical trial simulation of S-warfarin was used to predict times within therapeutic range for different dosing algorithms. Relative risks of clinical events, obtained from a meta-analysis of trials linking times within therapeutic range with outcomes, served as inputs to an economic analysis. Neither dabigatran nor rivaroxaban were cost-effective options. Along the cost-effectiveness frontier, in relation to clinically dosed warfarin, pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin and apixaban had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £13,226 and £20,671 per quality-adjusted life year gained, respectively. On the basis of our simulations, apixaban appears to be the most cost-effective treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pink et al. (2013) studied Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin and apixaban vs. Clinically dosed warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. In a simulation model, pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin and apixaban had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of £13,226 and £20,671 per QALY gained compared to clinically dosed warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: