Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis demonstrates systematic overestimation of SOC stocks in soils, highlighting necessary corrections for accuracy.
Estimation of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks requires estimates of the carbon content, bulk density, rock fragment content and depth of a respective soil layer. However, different application of these parameters could introduce a considerable bias. Here, we explain why three out of four frequently applied methods overestimate SOC stocks. In soils rich in rock fragments (> 30 vol. %), SOC stocks could be overestimated by more than 100 %, as revealed by using German Agricultural Soil Inventory data. Due to relatively low rock fragments content, the mean systematic overestimation for German agricultural soils was 2.1–10.1 % for three different commonly used equations. The equation ensemble as re-formulated here might help to unify SOC stock determination and avoid overestimation in future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poeplau et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: