Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Catalytic transfer hydrogenation (CTH) has emerged as a powerful and versatile alternative to high-pressure hydrogenation, providing enhanced safety, operational simplicity, and broad functional-group compatibility. This review presents a comprehensive analysis of hydrogen donors used in CTH, ranging from classical alcohols, formic acid, and organic hydride donors to emerging sustainable reductants such as glycerol, benzothiazoline, amine-boranes, and 1,4-butanediol. The structural, thermodynamic, and electronic features governing donor activation and hydrogen-release pathways are examined alongside the diverse mechanistic manifolds including MPV-type outer-sphere transfer, metal-hydride shuttling, metal-ligand cooperativity, base-promoted reductions, and concerted double-hydrogen transfer. Parallel advances in catalyst platforms are highlighted, encompassing noble and earth-abundant transition metals, pincer complexes, NHC-based systems, nanoparticles, main-group promoters, and metal-free bases. Representative applications across carbonyl, imine, nitrile, olefin, alkyne, and heteroarene reductions illustrate the expanding utility of CTH in modern synthesis. Emerging themes such as aqueous-phase processes, asymmetric transfer hydrogenation, biomass valorization, and sustainable donor-catalyst assemblies are also discussed. Together, these developments establish CTH as a central and rapidly advancing methodology, with significant potential for industrial implementation and future sustainable transformations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabharwal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: