Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: It has been shown that tumor thickness (TT) of melanocytic skin lesions (MSL) of less than 1 mm vertical thickness assessed by 20 MHz are often incorrectly evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 100-MHz ultrasound for the determination of TT of thin MSL, compared with conventional 20-MHz ultrasound and histologic findings. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with 50 suspicious MSL, including tumor diameter up to 1 cm and maximum vertical TT of less than 1 mm, were recruited. The agreement between the histologically and ultrasographically measured TT was analyzed using Bland and Altman plots. RESULTS: Compared to histology, 20-MHz ultrasound (33.9 microm) as well as 100-MHz (16 microm) resulted in overestimation of TT that was twofold higher for 20-MHz ultrasound. The latter also revealed wider 95% limits of agreement (4.9 to 63 microm) than 100-MHz ultrasound (3.5 to 28.7 microm). CONCLUSION: Analysis of agreement clearly demonstrated that the performance of 100-MHz ultrasound is superior to conventional 20-MHz ultrasound, even though a relatively small positive bias was observed in 100-MHz ultrasound, indicating a systematic error. We consider 100-MHz ultrasound a useful tool for the noninvasive determination of TT of thin MSL in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gambichler et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: