Randomized trial models seismic hazard in southern Italy, indicating the importance of multi-fault rupture scenarios.
Although fault-based approaches to seismic hazard assessment have been increasingly adopted worldwide, the official Italian hazard model, on which the national building code is based, still relies on a catalogue-based framework, with well-known limitations in capturing the long-term recurrences of large-magnitude events. In this study, we present a fault-based application to model seismicity rates for the southern Apennines (Italy) that incorporates a multi-fault rupture assumption. This area is of particular interest due to its active seismicity and the presence of large dams, for which robust long-term hazard estimates are essential. We use the SHERIFS code to model seismicity rates at the fault system-level, which allow us to explore epistemic uncertainties of fault and seismicity parameters (rupture scenarios, scaling laws, b-values and background seismicity). Our results highlight the key role of rupture models: scenarios allowing multi-fault ruptures outperform single-fault rupture models in terms of agreement with the regional seismicity and paleoseismic rates. Our findings support the inclusion of multi-fault rupture models in PSHA logic trees for the region and emphasize the need for improved fault behaviour characterization in southern Italy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessandrini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: