Randomized trial evaluates groundwater vulnerability in arid regions, indicating improved management strategies.
Groundwater vulnerability refers to an aquifer’s susceptibility to contamination based on natural hydrogeological properties, including geology, soil, topography, and unsaturated zone characteristics. In low-recharge arid systems, limited recharge reduces dilution and flushing, allowing contaminants introduced through anthropogenic activities to persist over time. This study assesses groundwater vulnerability in El-Farafra, El-Kharga, and Tushka using a GIS-based DRASTIC approach, enhanced with a Land-Use DRASTIC model to incorporate human activities. Parameters, including the depth-to-water table, net recharge, aquifer media, soil media, topography, the vadose zone, and hydraulic conductivity, were spatially analyzed to generate vulnerability indices. Sentinel-2 imagery was used for land-use classification. In addition, expert elicitation from twenty hydrogeology specialists provided alternative parameter weightings, which were compared with the standard DRASTIC weights. Results show that incorporating land use and expert-based weights refines vulnerability patterns, particularly in agricultural, urban, and industrial zones. El-Farafra exhibits the highest vulnerability due to intensive land use and hydrogeological conditions, El-Kharga shows moderate vulnerability, and Tushka shows lower vulnerability, where recharge from Lake Nasser enhances dilution and reduces contaminant persistence. The study highlights the importance of integrating land-use information and expert knowledge to improve vulnerability assessment in data-scarce arid environments and supports improved groundwater management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El-Mahdy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: