Inquiry reveals safety failures related to building regulations in a tragedy, suggesting need for better oversight.
The Inquiry into the fire at Grenfell Tower, London, in 2017 has exposed the failures that led to the tragedy in a commendably exhaustive manner. But the explanation of those failures is seriously inadequate. First, they are attributed to deregulation, when the Inquiry itself details the ways in which the cladding of the building was subject to multiple levels of regulation. It was not an absence of regulation, but the failure of very extensive regulation to identify the risk created by building work which turned a formerly fireproof building into what the Inquiry called a ‘death trap’. Second, the Inquiry does not explain why this risk was ever run. Grenfell Tower was cladded as part of a nationwide programme of insulating tower blocks in pursuit of climate change objectives which was undertaken with inadequate consideration of the implications for fire safety. The Grenfell fire followed from insufficient concern with limits to government capacity to implement policies believed desirable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Campbell (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: