Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates phytochemicals binding to EGFR T790M in hepatocellular carcinoma, suggesting potential therapeutic implications.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations drive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression, and the T790M gatekeeper substitution is the predominant mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies. Herein, we present multiscale quantum-classical in silico predictions of Phyllanthus niruri phytochemicals as non-covalent EGFR T790M binders, employing molecular docking, 100 ns molecular dynamics, MM-PBSA/MM-GBSA, per-residue decomposition, PCA/LDA, DFT at B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2-TZVP, and comparative wild-type EGFR simulations. Five phytochemicals exhibited computationally predicted binding affinities against EGFR T790M exceeding the non-covalent binding component of osimertinib (−25.74 kcal/mol): corilagin (−53.71 ± 5.05 kcal/mol), eriodictyol-7-rhamnopyranoside (−44.35 ± 4.51 kcal/mol), isoquercetin (−44.23 ± 2.92 kcal/mol), rutin (−42.15 ± 4.50 kcal/mol), and kaempferol-4-rhamnoside (−41.68 ± 3.69 kcal/mol). Wild-type EGFR simulations (PDB 1M17) yielded a selectivity index (IS) of 2.76 for corilagin (<!-- MathType@Translator@5@5@MathML2 (no namespace).tdl@MathML 2.0 (no namespace)@ -->
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lituma-González et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: