Retrospective analysis reveals 3D tumor volume enhances cervical metastasis prediction in oral squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting better risk management strategies.
Objectives To test whether pre-operative primary CT-based 3D tumor volume (TV) improves prediction of cervical spread in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) beyond conventional size metrics. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed 132 consecutive primary OSCC patients (2014–2019). Contrast-enhanced CT datasets were semi-automatically segmented to obtain 3D TV (cm 3 ), verified by a second observer. Multivariable logistic regression related log-TV to pathologic lymph-node metastasis (LNM), extranodal extension (ENE), and skip metastasis. Performance of radiologic TV, depth of invasion (DOI), and ellipsoid pathologic volume was compared by ROC/AUC and decision-curve analyses. Results Median CT-derived TV was 12.6 cm 3 . Log-TV independently predicted LNM (odds ratio 3.00, 95% CI 1.21–7.68; AUC 0.815), outperforming DOI (AUC 0.541) and pathologic volume (AUC 0.498). A non-linear pattern linked very small (< 1.8 cm 3 ) and large (> 16 cm 3 ) tumors to increased skip-metastasis probability (AUC 0.733). Radiologic and pathologic volumes showed minimal concordance (R 2 = 0.0002). Decision-curve analysis demonstrated consistent net benefit of the volume model across clinically relevant threshold probabilities for elective neck dissection. Conclusions CT-based 3D volumetry is an independent pre-operative predictor of cervical LNM, flags tumors prone to skip spread, and offers greater clinical utility than linear measures. Clinical relevance Integrating radiologic volumetry into staging could refine nodal management—particularly in clinically node-negative patients—by supporting risk-adapted selection between sentinel lymph-node biopsy and elective neck dissection; prospective validation is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmitz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: