Analyzes wave-particle duality using a quantum framework, indicating a structured response system.
This paper proposes a quantum object–field response framework for organizing wave–particle duality. The framework distinguishes a quantum object from the response structure it induces within an experimental arrangement. Within a given experimental arrangement, the quantum object is associated with an effective source representation, which induces a complex field-response amplitude, produces an effective response on the detection plane, and leads to normalized probability distributions and localized detection records. Within this layered structure, wave-like behavior is associated with propagation, superposition, coherence, and phase relations in the induced response, while particle-like behavior is associated with localized detection records. The framework is developed and tested in a computable single-quantum-object double-slit sector. Using a Gaussian source structure, rectangular double-slit apertures, a Fresnel propagation kernel, and a normalized Born-type probability mapping, the paper constructs coherent and incoherent detection distributions, interference-term decompositions, coherence-decay behavior, phase-difference scans, Fraunhofer far-field comparisons, parameter scans, detector-resolution effects, grid-convergence checks, and single-slit-limit tests. The numerical results show that the proposed framework provides a clear and computable object–response–probability chain for the double-slit setting, reproduces the standard double-slit interference structure, and remains internally consistent across the numerical checks performed. These results constitute a framework construction and consistency test within the double-slit sector and do not, by themselves, establish an experimental deviation from standard quantum mechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaoshi Zhou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: