Randomized trial assesses 3D road surface quality using a mobile multi-camera system at varying speeds.
Mobile mapping systems usually include cameras designed for 360° imaging and laser scanning point cloud coloring. However, the multi-camera systems are rarely optimized for producing photogrammetric image-based point clouds in road environments. In this study, we built a mobile 5-camera system and assessed its performance in determining the 3D geometry of road surfaces. The evaluation was carried out in two parts: First, we examined how driving speed ranging from 3 to 20 km/h affect the quality of the point cloud produced by the mobile multi-camera system. We compared this data to reference measurements of road surface samples obtained using a laboratory-grade structured-light scanner. Second, we compared the point cloud produced by the mobile multicamera system to that generated by a terrestrial laser scanner from a 10-meter single lane road section. In the case of the driving speed tests, the point cloud comparisons resulted an average 3D distance from 0.09 mm to 0.31 mm, and a standard deviation from 0.29 mm to 0.50 mm. On the road section, the average 3D distance between the points clouds was 0.97 mm, with a standard deviation of 0.59 mm. These results demonstrate the capability of the mobile multi-camera system in 3D reconstruction of road surfaces and encourage further research into the feasibility of multi-camera system configurations for studying road surface quality parameters and identifying the dimensions of road damages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaaja et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: