Formal architecture establishes structural integrity and governance for human-AI collaboration, indicating new development paths.
The AI-Native Meta-Architecture is a constitutional reference architecture that provides structural clarity, normative stability, and scalable autonomy across AI-mediated workflows. Rather than proposing a new model or algorithm, this work reframes AI alignment as an architectural systems engineering problem, following ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010. The architecture separates: Human meaning formation (upstream) Bounded AI orchestration (execution) Cybernetic constitutional governance (downstream) By forcing invariants through a strict schema compiler, the architecture ensures that autonomous systems execute only within verifiable, invariant-preserving boundaries. Core contributions include: C1 — Reference Architecture: A 12-node Directed Acyclic Execution Graph (DAEG) mapping the full lifecycle of Human–AI co-cognition. C2 — Formal Mathematical Model: Definitions of state spaces, invariant posets, compiler functions, and formal proofs of invariant preservation and bounded termination. C3 — Machine-Readable Constitution: A canonical JSON Schema (v4.0.0) translating human invariants into executable constraints. C4 — Cybernetic Governance Model: A second-order meta-loop enabling constitutional amendments, meaning re-examination, and adaptive governance. C5 — Evaluation Protocol: A Design Science validation protocol covering invariant stability, escalation correctness, meta-loop convergence, and compilation determinism. C6 — Reference Implementation: A reproducible implementation including the schema compiler, escalation engine, meta-operator, and example execution traces. This release includes the full v4.0 PDF, formal proofs, JSON schema, glossary, evaluation protocol, and canonical TikZ/SVG figures (Invariant Hierarchy and Schema Compilation Pipeline). All materials are published under CC BY 4.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuji Marutani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: