Presents a criterion for defining physical subsystem cuts in quantum systems, indicating implications for quantum dynamics.
Every use of an open quantum system presupposes a cut: a division of the world into a system and its environment, formalized as a tensor factorization of the Hilbert space. Which factorization is the physical one is not fixed by the Hilbert space — the same space admits infinitely many, and standard treatments select one by appeal to decoherence, which already presupposes a cut. This paper supplies the missing selection criterion. It adds no dynamics and no interaction; it imports the observable-induced tensor factorization from quantum information and asks, of any named candidate, whether the unchanged global dynamics descends to a well-defined dynamics on the reduced system state space, and whether the resulting quotient carries a complete identity structure. The exact criterion is a dynamical congruence: two global states with the same reduced state must have the same reduced future. It is necessary and sufficient for a representative-independent reduced dynamics; supplemented with La Profilée’s role and verdict structure it becomes a necessary-and-sufficient criterion for an exactly autonomous physical system cut; and an explicit two-qubit counterexample proves the physically admissible factorizations are a strict subset of the mathematical ones. A quantitative extension makes the criterion operationally testable: an autonomy defect bounds the unavoidable reduced-prediction error two-sidedly, errors accumulate additively, and a robust-persistence test — proven error below the margin to the identity boundary — keeps the persistence verdict invariant across all admissible global realizations. Everything is proven in finite dimensions. A uniqueness theorem, concrete margins for a given system, and the extension to the Type-III local algebras of relativistic quantum field theory remain open, and are marked as such throughout.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marc Maibom (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: