Demonstrates how minority parties moderate their positions to win seats in lopsided legislatures, suggesting a new perspective on polarization.
Polarization is typically greater in legislatures in which control of the majority is closely contested. Lee (2016) argues that this is because parties engage in more partisan behavior when they are focused on gaining or retaining majority control. This study offers an alternative explanation for this phenomenon that is more consistent with the existing theory and evidence on ideology and elections. When a party holds a clear minority, it moderates with the goal of winning more seats. Party positioning across state legislatures is more consistent with the hypothesis that clear minorities moderate than the hypothesis that parties in closely contested chambers polarize.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Fowler (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: