Case series describes severe respiratory issues in patients with MEGF10-related myopathy, highlighting genetic factors.
MEGF10 biallelic variants cause early-onset myopathy, areflexia, respiratory distress and dysphagia (EMARDD), congenital myopathies with cores, and later-onset myopathies with respiratory failure. As MEGF10 plays a key role in satellite cells proliferation and differentiation, these disorders are considered primary Satellite Cell-opathies. We present clinical, genetic, and laboratory findings from three patients with MEGF10 -related myopathy from two families: a 6-year-old boy with EMARDD, and two siblings with a milder myopathy with respiratory involvement. Patient 1, male, showed decreased fetal movements and profound neonatal hypotonia with respiratory failure, requiring tracheostomy soon after birth. At 6 years, he had lack of head and trunk control, scoliosis, and upper limbs antigravity movements. Muscle MRI revealed mild-to-moderate, symmetrical fibro-fatty replacement affecting scapular, paravertebral, gluteal and adductor muscles, with bilateral absence of the semimembranosus. Muscle biopsy revealed a reduction of Pax7-positive satellite cells. Genetic studies disclosed the novel homozygous MEGF10 c.337T>C, p.(Cys113Arg) variant. Patient 2 is a 24-year-old woman with myopathic facies, progressive axial and generalized weakness, and thoracolumbar scoliosis at 11 years, leading to progressive respiratory involvement necessitating tracheostomy at 14 years. Her 17-year-old brother, patient 3, experienced a threatened abortion and perinatal complications consisting of neonatal hypoxia, right arm monoplegia, and clavicle fracture, followed by motor delay, scoliosis and progressive respiratory dysfunction, requiring non-invasive ventilation at 16 years. P2 and P3 harbour the novel homozygous c.917G>C, p. (Arg306Pro) MEGF10 pathogenic variant. We describe three new patients with MEGF10 -related myopathy, showing severe but variable clinical expression, associated with two novel variants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pennisi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: