Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RESULTS As previously reported (4), serum IL-31 levels were significantly higher in patients with AD (2.13 ± 0.26 pg/ ml) than those of healthy controls (0.94 ± 0.28 pg/ml; p < 0.01; Fig. 1a). In addition, serum IL-31 levels were significantly higher in patients with CTCL (3.19 ± 0.74 pg/ml) than those of healthy controls (p < 0.05; Fig. 1a). We subsequently examined serum IL-31 levels in CTCL patients with different types of skin lesions. Serum IL31 levels in patients with patch and plaque, tumour and erythroderma were 1.05 ± 0.30 pg/ml, 6.25 ± 2.11 pg/ml and 5.00 ± 1.46 pg/ml, respectively (Fig. 1b). Serum IL-31 levels in patients with tumour were extremely high, which were significantly higher than those with healthy controls (p < 0.01) and patients with patch and plaque (p < 0.05). Serum IL-31 levels in patients with erythroderma were also significantly higher than those in healthy controls (p < 0.01). Serum IL-31 levels in patients with stage I, stage II, stage III and stage IV were 0.95 ± 29 pg/ml, 3.97 ± 1.43 pg/ml, 2.07 ± 0.00 pg/ ml and 7.98 ± 2.56 pg/ml, respectively (Fig. 1c). Serum IL-31 levels in patients with stage IV were significantly higher than those with healthy controls and patients with stage I (p < 0.05). Serum IL-31 levels in patients with stage II were significantly higher than those with healthy controls (p < 0.05). We also found that serum IL-31 levels correlated significantly with serum sIL-2R and LDH levels (r = 0.43, p < 0.05 and r = 0.34, p < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 1d, e), which have been reported to reflect disease activity of CTCL (8, 9). Thus, serum IL31 levels correlate with disease activity of CTCL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohmatsu et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: