Key result
Aortic distensibility measurements based on standard 4-chamber cine CMR demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement (ICC 0.97) and high reproducibility.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether aortic distensibility could be obtained with high reproducibility using standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta.
Can aortic distensibility be obtained with high reproducibility in standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta compared to transversal and orthogonal cross-sections?
Observational (n=31)
No
Can aortic distensibility be obtained with high reproducibility in standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta compared to transversal and orthogonal cross-sections?
Aortic distensibility measurements from standard 4-chamber cine CMR are highly reproducible and allow accurate assessment of arterial compliance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports reproducibility of 4-chamber aortic distensibility; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Aortic distensibility (AD) represents a well-established parameter of aortic stiffness. It remains unclear, however, whether AD can be obtained with high reproducibility in standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer agreement of AD based on different angles of the aorta and provided a sample size calculation of AD for future trials. Thirty-one patients underwent CMR. Angulation of the descending aorta was performed to obtain strictly transversal and orthogonal cross-sectional aortic areas. AD was obtained both area and diameter based. For area-based values, inter-observer agreement was highest for 4-chamber AD (ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.93–99), followed by orthogonal AD (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.91–98) and transversal AD (ICC 0.93; 95% CI 0.80–97). For diameter-based values, agreement was also highest for 4-chamber AD (ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.94–99), followed by orthogonal AD (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92–98) and transversal AD (ICC 0.91; 95% CI 0.77–96). Bland–Altman plots confirmed a small variation among observers. Sample size calculation showed a sample size of 12 patients to detect a change in 4-chamber AD of 1 × 10−3 mmHg−1 with either the area or diameter approach. AD measurements are highly reproducible and allow an accurate and rapid assessment of arterial compliance from standard 4-chamber cine CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoiber et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Variable indications for CMR (n=31). Standard 4-chamber cine CMR vs. Strictly orthogonal or transversal cine CMR was evaluated on Inter-observer agreement of area-based aortic distensibility from 4-chamber cine CMR (ICC 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-0.99). Aortic distensibility measurements based on standard 4-chamber cine CMR demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement (ICC 0.97) and high reproducibility.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: