Shows no evidence for electroluminescence cooling in LEDs under low voltage, suggesting standard operation.
There has been an ongoing hypothesis, since at least the 1950s, that light-emitting diodes (LEDs) operated with a forward bias voltage less than the bandgap-equivalent voltage should act as optical refrigerators. Since LEDs emit luminescence radiation approximately equal to the bandgap energy, application of a sub-bandgap-equivalent voltage supposedly means that the difference in the emitted photon energy and the applied bias must be made up by the net absorption of lattice phonons. As a result, it is surmised that cooling should occur. Here, we show that the voltage is simply the change in free energy, also known as the quasi-Fermi level separation, and we distinguish free energy from the electrical energy that is required to operate LEDs. Operation of LEDs with forward bias voltage less than the bandgap-equivalent voltage is normal, and this operating condition neither implies nor requires electroluminescence cooling or any other novel explanation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander P. Kirk (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: