Randomized trial develops a proton-proton fusion model in constrained null geometry, suggesting new insights into fusion reactions.
This work develops a parameter-free proton–proton fusion model within Constrained Null Geometry (CNG). The reaction is formulated as a rank-changing transition from a six-channel entrance configuration to the discrete five-channel X5 deuteron stratum. Starting from the canonical six-channel reconstruction operator, the construction derives the normalized first-loss invariant, the exchange-odd AAB reconstruction trace, the connected entrance interaction, and the unique radial Riesz scale. The resulting proton–proton entrance Hamiltonian consists of the repulsive Coulomb operator supplemented by a geometrically fixed rank-one singlet kernel. The derived entrance parameters are: g_tr = 1/2 beta = gamma_X = sqrt(2 mu_pn B_X5) / (hbar c) A trace-preserving first-loss lock maps the removed internal direction into a residual reconstruction trace rather than discarding it. Within the primitive local quadratic CNG action, gauge covariance, radial-domain uniqueness, and multiplicity-one spin–isospin coupling determine the leading charged-current transition and exclude an independent constant transverse boundary vertex at threshold. The Coulomb-resolvent completion gives: Lambda_65 strong at zero energy = 1.70008535725480 This leads to the threshold prediction: S_pp(0) = 2.74004468156394 × 10^-22 keV b The accompanying supplement contains theorem audits, numerical ledgers, symbol and unit tables, falsification criteria, reproducibility scripts, reaction-rate utilities, and machine-readable CSV and JSON outputs. The model is explicitly testable through the microscopic AAB singlet matrix element, the connected-polarization sign, radial-domain uniqueness, the absence of a diproton pole, and the possible emergence of additional microscopic boundary degrees of freedom.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luka Gluvić (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: