Why the study?
The efficacy of different multi-electrode mapping configurations to identify micro-reentrant pathways sustaining AF remains undefined.
Do different multi-electrode mapping configurations affect the detection of micro-anatomic reentries sustaining atrial fibrillation in a simulated model?
Population
Simulated anisotropic atrial tissue structure incorporating a sub-endocardial laterally-insulated myobundle across N = 656 MEM configurations
Comparison
Unipolar vs bipolar vs omnipolar MEM configurations varying spacing, orientation, contact distance, and position
Design
Simulation study
Key result
Unipolar multi-electrode mapping configurations with 1-6 mm spacing and optimal contact detected sub-endocardial reentry pathways sustaining atrial fibrillation in 50-100% of simulated cases.
Authors
Loading...
Unipolar mapping may optimize micro-reentry detection in AF simulations; leaves open clinical translation and ablation outcomes.
Do different multi-electrode mapping configurations affect the detection of micro-anatomic reentries sustaining atrial fibrillation in a simulated model?
Dense unipolar multi-electrode mapping configurations with 1-6 mm spacing optimize the detection of micro-anatomic reentrant circuits sustaining atrial fibrillation in simulated models.
Rodrigo et al. (2026) studied Atrial fibrillation (n=656). Multi-electrode mapping (MEM) configurations vs. Various inter-electrode distances, orientations, and contact distances was evaluated on Detection of sub-endocardial reentry pathways sustaining AF. Unipolar multi-electrode mapping configurations with 1-6 mm spacing and optimal contact detected sub-endocardial reentry pathways sustaining atrial fibrillation in 50-100% of simulated cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: