Evaluates enhanced tumor uptake of eFAP-51 in cancer, indicating its potential for theranostic use.
Overexpression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) in cancer-associated fibroblasts enables a highly selective targeting strategy using FAP inhibitors. However, radiolabeled small-molecule FAP inhibitors (FAPIs) show limited tumor retention, restricting therapeutic applications. Multimerization represents a promising strategy to enhance tumor uptake and retention through polyvalent binding. Here, we report the rational design and evaluation of dimeric FAP-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for theranostic applications. Based on the (4-quinolinoyl)-glycyl-2-cyanopyrrolidine (QCP) scaffold, a series of monomeric FAPIs were assembled into dimeric radioligands using three distinct tripod-based platforms and equipped with a DOTA-GA chelator for efficient radiolabeling with indium-111 and lutetium-177; systematic in vitro and in vivo evaluation of binding affinity, stability, cellular uptake, and tumor targeting identified eFAP-51 and eFAP-52 as lead candidates, both showing high radiochemical yield and purity, favorable stability, and sub-nanomolar affinity for FAP with strong selectivity over DPP4. Further studies demonstrated superior tumor targeting and pharmacokinetics for eFAP-51 compared with the clinical reference FAPI-46, with [ 111 In]In-eFAP-51 exhibiting more than 4-fold higher tumor uptake at 48 h post-injection (3.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.71 ± 0.1%ID/g) and prolonged retention. eFAP-51 was subsequently radiolabeled with lutetium-177 to yield a stable therapeutic candidate, and dose-dependent studies revealed that intermediate molar doses (0.3–0.6 nmol) provided an optimal balance between tumor uptake and tumor-to-background contrast. The FAPI dimer eFAP-51 showed favorable tumor targeting and pharmacokinetics, supporting its potential for clinical translation in theranostic oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: