Retrospective case series evaluates multidomain rehabilitation's effect on concussion symptoms in older adults, suggesting improvement in recovery.
BACKGROUND: Concussions are increasingly common in older adults, with falls as the leading mechanism of injury. Older adults often experience prolonged recovery, and lingering post-concussive symptoms, perpetuating the cycle of elevated fall risk with significant public health implications. This highlights the need for age-specific concussion care incorporating multidomain assessment and individualized treatment. AIM: This retrospective case series explores the effect of a structured, stepwise evaluation and treatment framework on post-concussive symptoms in older adults. METHODS: Five females over 60 years old with post-concussive symptoms completed the targeted concussion protocol as part of a larger prospective study. The protocol included modules addressing key rehabilitation domains: aerobic exercise to support autonomic regulation, brain-body integration exercises to improve motor control, and progressive visual-vestibular rehabilitation incorporating oculomotor training, postural stability challenges, and dual-tasking. Objective measures included the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale, Brain Injury Vision Symptom Survey (BIVSS), Dizziness Handicap Inventory, King Devick, a binocular vision screening tool, and an enhanced version of the Vestibulo-Oculomotor Screen (VOMS). RESULTS: All patients demonstrated reduced symptom burden and functional improvements. Vestibular-oculomotor and motor control gains included a 53.9% average improvement in BIVSS scores, a mean 10-s reduction in King Devick time, and a 19.05-cm improvement in binocular vision measured via Brock String. Three patients normalized ocular alignment and near point convergence, while all showed improved Super Saccades performance. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a multimodal protocol shows potential in reducing post-concussive impairments and symptoms in older adults. Larger studies are needed to establish effectiveness and feasibility in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ziaks et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: