Key result
Highly trained endurance athletes had similar pulmonary blood flow during adenosine stimulation compared to controls but showed significantly reduced overall blood flow heterogeneity (from 84% to 70%, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does intravenous adenosine infusion alter pulmonary blood flow heterogeneity differently in highly trained endurance athletes compared to healthy controls?
Observational (n=20)
Does intravenous adenosine infusion alter pulmonary blood flow heterogeneity differently in highly trained endurance athletes compared to healthy controls?
Highly trained endurance athletes demonstrate reduced pulmonary blood flow heterogeneity in response to adenosine, suggesting a more extensively recruitable capillary reserve compared to healthy controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small observational study of PBF in athletes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Pulmonary blood flow (PBF) is an important determinant of endurance sports performance, yet studies investigating adaptations of the pulmonary circulation in athletes are scarce. In the present study, we investigated PBF, its distribution, and heterogeneity at baseline and during intravenous systemic adenosine infusion in 10 highly trained male endurance athletes and 10 untrained but fit healthy controls, using positron emission tomography and [(15)O]water at rest and during adenosine infusion at supine body posture. Our results indicate that PBF at rest and during adenosine stimulation was similar in both groups (213 ± 55 and 563 ± 138 ml·100 ml(-1)·min(-1) in athletes and 206 ± 83 and 473 ± 212 ml·100 ml(-1)·min(-1) in controls, respectively). Although the PBF response to adenosine was thus unchanged in athletes, overall PBF heterogeneity was reduced from rest to adenosine infusion (from 84 ± 18 to 70 ± 19%, P < 0.05), while remaining unchanged in healthy controls (77 ± 16 to 85 ± 33%, P = 0.4). Additionally, there was a marked gravitational influence on general PBF distribution so that clear dorsal dominance was observed both at rest and during adenosine infusion, but training status did not have an effect on this distribution. Regional blood flow heterogeneity was markedly lower in the high-perfusion dorsal areas, both at rest and during adenosine, in all subjects, but flow heterogeneity in dorsal area tended to further decrease in response to adenosine in athletes. In conclusion, reduced blood flow heterogeneity in response to adenosine in endurance athletes may be a reflection of capillary reserve, which is more extensively recruitable in athletes than in matched healthy control subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heinonen et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Healthy (endurance athletes vs controls) (n=20). Highly trained endurance athlete status vs. Untrained but fit healthy controls was evaluated on Pulmonary blood flow during adenosine stimulation (ml·100 ml(-1)·min(-1)). Highly trained endurance athletes had similar pulmonary blood flow during adenosine stimulation compared to controls but showed significantly reduced overall blood flow heterogeneity (from 84% to 70%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: