Key result
Intra-arterial aminophylline did not reduce the change in forearm vascular conductance during hypoxic exercise at 20% maximum voluntary contraction compared to saline.
Why the study?
Does adenosine receptor antagonism with aminophylline reduce augmented skeletal muscle vasodilation during hypoxic exercise in healthy humans?
RCT (n=21)
Alternated and randomized
No
Does adenosine receptor antagonism with aminophylline reduce augmented skeletal muscle vasodilation during hypoxic exercise in healthy humans?
Adenosine receptor activation is not obligatory for the augmented hyperemia observed during hypoxic exercise in humans.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adenosine antagonism does not blunt hypoxic exercise hyperemia in healthy volunteers; hypothesis-generating for mechanisms in disease states.
We tested the hypothesis that adenosine contributes to augmented skeletal muscle vasodilation during hypoxic exercise. In separate protocols, subjects performed incremental rhythmic forearm exercise (10% and 20% of maximum) during normoxia and normocapnic hypoxia (80% arterial O2 saturation). In protocol 1 (n = 8), subjects received an intra-arterial administration of saline (control) and aminophylline (adenosine receptor antagonist). In protocol 2 (n = 10), subjects received intra-arterial phentolamine (alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist) and combined phentolamine and aminophylline administration. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC; in ml x min(-1).100 mmHg(-1)) was calculated from forearm blood flow (in ml/min) and blood pressure (in mmHg). In protocol 1, the change in FVC (DeltaFVC; change from normoxic baseline) during hypoxic exercise with saline was 172 +/- 29 and 314 +/- 34 ml x min(-1) x 100 mmHg(-1) (10% and 20%, respectively). Aminophylline administration did not affect DeltaFVC during hypoxic exercise at 10% (190 +/- 29 ml x min(-1)x100 mmHg(-1), P = 0.4) or 20% (287 +/- 48 ml x min(-1) x 100 mmHg(-1), P = 0.3). In protocol 2, DeltaFVC due to hypoxic exercise with phentolamine infusion was 313 +/- 30 and 453 +/- 41 ml x min(-1) x 100 mmHg(-1) (10% and 20% respectively). DeltaFVC was similar at 10% (352 +/- 39 ml min(-1) x 100 mmHg(-1), P = 0.8) and 20% (528 +/- 45 ml x min(-1) x 100 mmHg(-1), P = 0.2) hypoxic exercise with combined phentolamine and aminophylline. In contrast, DeltaFVC to exogenous adenosine was reduced by aminophylline administration in both protocols (P < 0.05 for both). These observations suggest that adenosine receptor activation is not obligatory for the augmented hyperemia during hypoxic exercise in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casey et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=21). Aminophylline vs. Saline was evaluated on Change in forearm vascular conductance (ΔFVC) during hypoxic exercise at 20% maximum voluntary contraction (ml/min/100 mmHg) (p=0.3). Intra-arterial aminophylline did not reduce the change in forearm vascular conductance during hypoxic exercise at 20% maximum voluntary contraction compared to saline.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: