Why the study?
Does adenosine receptor blockade with aminophylline reduce hypoxia-induced forearm vasodilation in normal subjects?
Does adenosine receptor blockade with aminophylline reduce hypoxia-induced forearm vasodilation in normal subjects?
Adenosine contributes to hypoxia-induced forearm vasodilation in humans, whereas cholinergic mechanisms do not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adenosine may mediate hypoxic vasodilation in healthy subjects; leaves open its role and therapeutic relevance in clinical hypoxia.
In humans, hypoxia leads to increased sympathetic neural outflow to skeletal muscle. However, blood flow increases in the forearm. The mechanism of hypoxia-induced vasodilation is unknown. To test whether hypoxia-induced vasodilation is cholinergically mediated or is due to local release of adenosine, normal subjects were studied before and during acute hypoxia (inspired O(2) 10.5%; approximately 20 min). In experiment I, aminophylline (50-200 microg. min(-1). 100 ml forearm tissue(-1)) was infused into the brachial artery to block adenosine receptors (n = 9). In experiment II, cholinergic vasodilation was blocked by atropine (0.4 mg over 4 min) infused into the brachial artery (n = 8). The responses of forearm blood flow (plethysmography) and forearm vascular resistance to hypoxia in the infused and opposite (control) forearms were compared. During hypoxia (arterial O(2) saturation 77 +/- 2%), minute ventilation and heart rate increased while arterial pressure remained unchanged; forearm blood flow rose by 35 +/- 6% in the control forearm but only by 5 +/- 8% in the aminophylline-treated forearm (P < 0.02). Accordingly, forearm vascular resistance decreased by 29 +/- 5% in the control forearm but only by 9 +/- 6% in the aminophylline-treated forearm (P < 0.02). Atropine did not attenuate forearm vasodilation during hypoxia. These data suggest that adenosine contributes to hypoxia-induced vasodilation, whereas cholinergic vasodilation does not play a role.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leuenberger et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: