Randomized trial demonstrates causal influences in concept acquisition through attractor dynamics, highlighting system-level learning effects.
Description:Can a minimal cognitive architecture built on attractor dynamics support concept-like representations across formation, generalization, discrimination, causal behavioral influence, and system-level learning? We built one and asked. In a 32-dimensional field-space runtime with a frozen safety projection and MiniLM embeddings, six linked experiments spanning five semantically distinct concept families and 150 independent seeds produced a chain of results. Structured experience reliably produces attractors, but formation alone does not distinguish concept-relevant from concept-irrelevant populations. Generalization provides the key filter: attractors with target-family provenance activate on held-out within-category prompts, while control attractors do not (77% vs 0%). The same attractors discriminate within-category from near-category prompts (AUC = 0.683; 74% of testable seeds AUC ≥ 0.60), though boundary tightness varies across seeds. Selective ablation of target-provenance attractors causally changes behavioral output in 96% of seeds. After formation, every seed produces different behavioral output on identical held-out prompts, with target-family prompts shifting 15.8x more than filler prompts. This learning effect replicates across all five families (98.7% verdict change, 94.0% family-specific), though the medical misinformation family shows a qualitatively distinct pattern. A prototype centroid baseline achieves 100% generalization (versus ADAM's 77%) and equivalent discrimination, indicating that the attractor mechanism's contribution is dynamical: field-state dynamics, causal intervenability, and system-level behavioral change, not static representation. Under minimal conditions, an attractor-based cognitive system can support concept acquisition with measurable causal effects — modifiable, ablatable, and functionally coupled to a downstream readout in ways a static representation cannot. This is v1, assembled from raw Markdown source. The canonical manuscript will be formatted in LaTeX for journal submission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yao‐Sheng Chen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: