This article examines how local land-use policies influence housing supply elasticity in Finnish cities, indicating important implications for urban planning.
This article examines the long-run stock elasticity of housing supply and factors associated with their cross-city variation across 22 Finnish cities, a context characterized by strong municipal control over land use. We adopt a two-step approach. First, using time-series econometric methods on quarterly data from 1988 to 2020, we find that the long-run stock elasticity varies substantially across cities, ranging from 0.3 to 2.2. Second, drawing on novel city-level indices constructed to capture differences in land-use policy restrictiveness, we examine how the local land-use policy environment relates to supply elasticity. Our cross-sectional analysis indicates that cities with more restrictive land-use policy interventions—especially those associated with higher indirect costs of housing development—exhibit lower supply elasticities. Together with city size and geographical constraints, these interventions are associated with approximately 70% of the observed cross-city variation in elasticity. This suggests that delays and uncertainty in planning and development may be relevant areas for further evaluation for local public authorities when considering housing supply responsiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lönnroth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: