Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines technology-facilitated client violence in social services, revealing its impact on professional discretion.
Client violence remains a challenge in social services, yet the implications of digitalization for violence have received limited scholarly attention. Drawing on street-level bureaucracy and insights from a public service ecosystem perspective, this study examines how technology-facilitated client violence (TFCV) emerges in everyday street-level discretionary work and how professional discretion is shaped in situations involving TFCV. The analysis draws on qualitative data consisting of open-ended survey responses from street-level professionals (n = 135) and interviews with social care managers (n = 18) in Finland. The findings identify four inter-related empirical dimensions through which TFCV takes form in everyday street-level work—intrusive and on-going contact, public professional discrediting, intimidation and coercion, and technology-facilitated personal harm. These dynamics shape discretionary practice by reconfiguring the temporal organization of work, challenging professional authority and legitimacy, exerting moral and coercive pressure on decision-making, and blurring the boundaries between professional and private life. The reshaping of professional discretion across micro-, meso-, and macro-level conditions is examined. The findings highlight TFCV as a new form of external control shaping discretionary practice and underscore the need for organizational and regulatory responses that safeguard street-level work while preserving clients’ legitimate rights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piippo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: