Randomized trial demonstrates improved structured extraction in consumer app reviews, suggesting efficient low-cost methods for deployment.
We present a fully reproducible case study in fine-tuning and deploying a sub-billion-parameter language model for closed-vocabulary structured extraction on commodity hardware. Using low-rank adaptation (LoRA), we fine-tune Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct to extract a strict four-field JSON object (sentiment, a bounded topic set, a price-mention flag, and an implied 1–5 rating) from unstructured mobile-application reviews, and we evaluate it with a fully deterministic parse-and-compare protocol that uses no model-based judge. Training is performed entirely on an Apple M4 Mac mini using the Metal Performance Shaders (MPS) backend in 32-bit precision; because 4-bit bitsandbytes quantization is CUDA-only, this configuration deviates from canonical QLoRA and the associated quantization-recovery control cannot be produced, a limitation we state explicitly rather than omit. On a held-out test set of 200 examples, fine-tuning improves the unweighted aggregate score from 62.3% to 76.6% (+14.2 points), with the largest gain on the closed-vocabulary topic field (26.1% to 73.5%). We then profile the quantized deployment (4-bit weights, served via Ollama) using a measurement methodology adapted from the low-bit-inference literature: peak-memory decomposition, key–value (KV) cache-quantization tolerance, the memory-bandwidth throughput ceiling, and energy per token. The central deployment finding is a qualitative collapse under aggressive KV-cache quantization: an 8-bit KV cache is near-lossless (77.95% to 77.02%), whereas a 4-bit KV cache reduces aggregate accuracy to 0.38% and valid-JSON parse rate to 10.5%. We discuss the label-circularity threat that limits the interpretation of three of the four fields, and we release all code, data splits, model artifacts, and raw measurements
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanmay Deshpande (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: