Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Financial markets rely on a chain of data dependencies that begins with accurate security master data and extends through end-of-day pricing, valuation, trade support, risk reporting, financial control and regulatory accountability. In this chain, a stale price, inconsistent identifier, incorrect asset classification, broken issuer mapping or unresolved vendor discrepancy can propagate across trading, operations, risk and finance processes. This article develops the Reference Data-to-Market Integrity Control Framework (RDMICF), an applied control model for finance operations teams that manage security reference data, pricing-control checks and exception remediation. The framework is grounded in the data-quality and data-governance literature, supervisory expectations on risk-data aggregation, fair valuation and model-risk management, and recent applied scholarship on continuous controls monitoring, AI-enabled audit planning and liquidity-risk analytics. A controlled synthetic operational dataset of 8,010 exception records across 12 monthly review cycles is used to demonstrate the framework's analytical value. The analysis indicates that a disciplined controls architecture could reduce the aggregate exception rate from 23.95 to 11.03 exceptions per 1,000 reviewed records, representing a 53.9% reduction, while lowering SLA breaches from 27.3% to 6.5% and reducing median remediation time from 1.88 to 1.18 days. Heat-map analysis identifies the most risk-sensitive intersections: fixed-income pricing, stale prices, corporate-action adjustments, product taxonomy and security identifiers. The article contributes a practical, auditable and scalable framework for transforming reference-data maintenance from a back-office correction activity into a market-integrity capability that strengthens operational resilience, valuation discipline, data governance and executive decision support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sydney et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: