Evaluates ASL mapping for brain tumors, suggesting improved differentiation of high-grade gliomas from metastases.
Background To evaluate whether blood-brain barrier (BBB) mapping via arterial spin-labeling (ASL)-derived exchange time (Tex) can differentiate high-grade gliomas from brain metastases and to compare regional BBB alterations with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-derived leakage parameters (K2). Methods 18 patients with therapy-naive cerebral masses (11 gliomas, 7 metastases) underwent multi-echo-ASL and DSC perfusion MRI. Tex maps were obtained using a validated extended two-compartment model. K2 maps were derived from single-echo DSC. Tex and absolute K2 (|K2|) were quantified in contrast-enhancing tumor (CET), peritumoral T2/FLAIR hyperintense region (PTR), gray matter (GM), and white matter (WM). Regional differences were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann–Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses evaluated discrimination between gliomas and metastases. Results Tex was significantly lower in PTR of gliomas versus metastases (p = 0.046). In ROC analysis, Tex slightly outperformed |K2| alone (AUC=0.792, 95% CI [0.535, 0.986] vs. AUC=0.760, 95% CI [0.508, 0.959]), with further improvement upon combination (AUC=0.833, 95% CI [0.577, 1.000]). In gliomas, Tex was significantly lower in CET than in GM and WM (both p < 0.01) and PTR showed significantly lower Tex than WM (p < 0.01). |K2| was significantly higher in CET than all other regions (all p < 0.01) but did not differ between PTR and GM/WM. Conclusion In this exploratory study, ASL-derived Tex suggests stronger BBB alterations in peritumoral tissue of high-grade gliomas compared with brain metastases. Adding |K2| further improved discrimination. This supports ASL-based BBB mapping as a complement to DSC leakage imaging. Validation in larger multicenter cohorts is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raffler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: