What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to critique current research evaluation metrics and propose a more context-sensitive approach for assessing research impact.

From metrics to meaning in research evaluation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Randomized trial evaluates research impact assessment approaches in South Africa, suggesting context-sensitive frameworks for improvement.

The aim is to critique current research evaluation metrics and propose a more context-sensitive approach for assessing research impact.
Evaluation of existing citation-based metrics like h-indices and impact factors.
Analysis of altmetrics and their implications for scholarly influence.
Development of a flexible framework that combines quantitative and qualitative evidence for research impact assessment.
Current metrics reinforce biases and inequities, privileging certain institutions and languages.
Proposed framework aligns with global responsible research assessment movements like DORA.
Shift from merely counting research outputs to interpreting their broader contributions is necessary.

Sobuwa et al. (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Randomized trial evaluates research impact assessment approaches in South Africa, suggesting context-sensitive frameworks for improvement.