Cross-sectional study identifies psychosocial factors linked to antenatal depression screening in pregnant women, suggesting additional assessment may enhance care.
Background/Objectives: Identifying pregnant women with heightened emotional vulnerability remains a challenge in antenatal care. A positive screening result is a comparatively infrequent event in clinical samples of moderate size, which complicates the statistical modelling of associated factors. This study aimed to characterise the psychosocial profile associated with a positive antenatal depression screen, integrating attachment style, perception of motherhood, previous emotional history and sleep problems. Methods: A total of 140 women in the third trimester of pregnancy were assessed cross-sectionally using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), with a threshold of 14 or above defining a positive screen; the Adult Attachment Scale; and single-item psychosocial indicators. Associations were examined using the chi-square test, the Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test, and Firth penalized logistic regression, chosen to correct the separation arising from the small number of events. Results: The screen was positive in 15.0% of participants. Negative perception of motherhood, anxious–ambivalent attachment, previous emotional history and sleep disturbances were all significantly associated with depressive symptoms; in the multivariable model, only negative perception of motherhood remained independently associated with a positive screen. Conclusions: Structured psychosocial assessment may usefully complement standard EPDS screening in the early identification of antenatal emotional vulnerability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soldan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: