Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Junctionless accumulation-mode (JAM) devices with channel lengths <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">Lg </tex></formula> down to 26 nm were fabricated on a trigate process and compared to conventional inversion-mode (IM) devices. This letter represents the first experimental comparison of short-channel JAM-to-IM devices at matched off-state leakage <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">(Ioff)</tex> </formula> . The JAM devices show better channel mobility (when moderately doped) and lower gate capacitance than the IM control counterparts at matched <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">Ioff</tex></formula> . However, the JAM devices also show reduced gate control and degraded short-channel characteristics. The observed degraded behavior of JAM relative to IM is explained with the aid of device simulations and a simple analytic model of the channel charge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rios et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: