Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Junctionless accumulation-mode (JAM) devices with channel lengths <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">Lg </tex></formula> down to 26 nm were fabricated on a trigate process and compared to conventional inversion-mode (IM) devices. This letter represents the first experimental comparison of short-channel JAM-to-IM devices at matched off-state leakage <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">(Ioff)</tex> </formula> . The JAM devices show better channel mobility (when moderately doped) and lower gate capacitance than the IM control counterparts at matched <formula formulatype="inline" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex Notation="TeX">Ioff</tex></formula> . However, the JAM devices also show reduced gate control and degraded short-channel characteristics. The observed degraded behavior of JAM relative to IM is explained with the aid of device simulations and a simple analytic model of the channel charge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rios et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: