Key result
Virtual pre-implant modeling of transcatheter pulmonary valves underestimated distal device volume compared to actual implants (P=0.06), while proximal volumes were similar (P>0.80).
Why the study?
Predicting secure, atraumatic catheter-based pulmonary valve implantation is challenging due to complex RVOT dynamics, prompting evaluation of pre-implant predictive modeling.
Does virtual modeling accurately predict device volume and compression compared to actual transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation in ovine models of Tetralogy of Fallot?
Does virtual modeling accurately predict device volume and compression compared to actual transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation in ovine models of Tetralogy of Fallot?
Pre-implant modeling assuming a rigid vessel wall may underestimate distal RVOT expansion following actual transcatheter pulmonary valve placement.
Virtual modeling may underestimate distal volumes in TPVR; leaves open need for compliant-wall assumptions in pre-implant planning.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary insufficiency is a consequence of transannular patch repair in Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) leading to late morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter native outflow tract pulmonary valve replacement has become a reality. However, predicting a secure, atraumatic implantation of a catheter-based device remains a significant challenge due to the complex and dynamic nature of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). We sought to quantify the differences in compression and volume for actual implants, and those predicted by pre-implant modeling. METHODS: We used custom software to interactively place virtual transcatheter pulmonary valves (TPVs) into RVOT models created from pre-implant and post Harmony valve implant CT scans of 5 ovine surgical models of TOF to quantify and visualize device volume and compression. RESULTS: Virtual device placement visually mimicked actual device placement and allowed for quantification of device volume and radius. On average, simulated proximal and distal device volumes and compression did not vary statistically throughout the cardiac cycle (P = 0.11) but assessment was limited by small sample size. In comparison to actual implants, there was no significant pairwise difference in the proximal third of the device (P > 0.80), but the simulated distal device volume was significantly underestimated relative to actual device implant volume (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pre-implant modeling which assumes a rigid vessel wall may not accurately predict the degree of distal RVOT expansion following actual device placement. We suggest the potential for virtual modeling of TPVR to be a useful adjunct to procedural planning, but further development is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jolley et al. (2018) studied Tetralogy of Fallot (n=5). Virtual pre-implant modeling vs. Actual device placement was evaluated on Device volume and compression (p=0.06). Virtual pre-implant modeling of transcatheter pulmonary valves underestimated distal device volume compared to actual implants (P=0.06), while proximal volumes were similar (P>0.80).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: