April 10, 2024Catheterization and Cardiovascular InterventionsOpen Access

Finite element modeling with patient‐specific geometry to assess clinical risks of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

CDCarly L. DonahueUniversity of Minnesota CWClaire L. WestmanUniversity of Minnesota BFBrittany FaanesUniversity of Minnesota

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Retrospective evaluation demonstrates reliable risk assessment in percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation candidates, highlighting potential for rapid pre-procedural clinical planning.

Key Points

Accurate pre-procedural risk assessment for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation was achieved through patient-specific models, avoiding coronary compression and valve insufficiency.
A lumen diameter change exceeding 20% correctly predicted aortic valve insufficiency or coronary artery compression across all 12 evaluated patients.
Simulation using patient-specific finite element models resolved clinical risks in 2–6 min on a desktop computer, highlighting potential for rapid pre-procedural evaluation.

Cite This Study

Donahue et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6fb85b6db6435876757c9 https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31016

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Retrospective evaluation demonstrates reliable risk assessment in percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation candidates, highlighting potential for rapid pre-procedural clinical planning.

Finite element modeling with patient‐specific geometry to assess clinical risks of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Finite element modeling with patient‐specific geometry to assess clinical risks of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider