Key result
Patient-specific finite element analysis indicated a Sapien29 device with prestenting as optimal, though clinical implantation was suspended due to perceived high risk of embolization.
Why the study?
Can patient-specific finite element models help select the most appropriate transcatheter valve device for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation?
Case Report (n=1)
Can patient-specific finite element models help select the most appropriate transcatheter valve device for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation?
Patient-specific finite element modeling can simulate transcatheter valve implantation to support clinical decision-making, though clinical judgment remains paramount as demonstrated by the suspension of the procedure in this case.
OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: Patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations were used to assess different transcatheter valve devices and help select the most appropriate treatment strategy for a patient (17-year-old male) with borderline dimensions for Melody® percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (PPVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient-specific implantation site morphology was derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images along with the implantation site mechanical behavior by coupling systolic/diastolic dimensions and the pressure gradient in a linear elastic model, and iterative tuning. In this way, the model accounted for the mechanical response not only of the arterial wall, but also of the surrounding tissue. Four stents (2 balloon-expandable including prestenting and 2 self-expandable) were virtually implanted and the stent final configuration, anchoring, migration forces, arterial wall stresses, paravalvular regurgitation, and device mechanical performance were evaluated. A Sapien29 device with prestenting was indicated as the optimal approach for this specific patient as it had a fully open valve, safe anchoring along the entire circumference, low risk of paravalvular leak, and arterial rupture. However, at the time of the PPVI procedure, after balloon sizing, device implantation was suspended due to perceived high risk of device embolization. CONCLUSIONS: FE analysis allows a comparison between different treatment scenarios to add information to the clinical decision making process. However, further studies are required to fully predict patient-specific response to stenting and therefore true clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosi et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Borderline dimensions for percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation (n=1). Patient-specific finite element (FE) simulations was evaluated on Stent final configuration, anchoring, migration forces, arterial wall stresses, paravalvular regurgitation, and device mechanical performance. Patient-specific finite element analysis indicated a Sapien29 device with prestenting as optimal, though clinical implantation was suspended due to perceived high risk of embolization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: