Key result
Endurance-trained athletes demonstrated augmented resting global diastolic function (E/A ratio 1.62 vs 1.18; P<0.01) and long-axis diastolic velocities compared with strength-trained athletes.
Why the study?
Does endurance training compared to strength training improve left ventricular functional reserve in athletes with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Population
18 endurance-trained and 11 strength-trained athletes with left ventricular hypertrophy, and 14 sedentary…
Comparison
Endurance training vs Strength training and sedentary controls
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Supports modality-specific diastolic effects in athletes with LVH; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice implications.
Cross-Sectional (n=43)
Does endurance training compared to strength training improve left ventricular functional reserve in athletes with left ventricular hypertrophy?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.62% vs 1.18%
p-value: p=<0.01
Endurance training is associated with augmented left ventricular long-axis diastolic function and greater functional reserve compared to strength training in athletes with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Vinereanu et al. (2002) conducted a cross-sectional in Left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes (n=43). Endurance training vs. Strength training was evaluated on Resting global diastolic function (E/A ratio) (p=<0.01). Endurance-trained athletes demonstrated augmented resting global diastolic function (E/A ratio 1.62 vs 1.18; P<0.01) and long-axis diastolic velocities compared with strength-trained athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: