Randomized trial investigates classifier-noun agreement processing in CSL learners, suggesting structural cues are prioritized.
Classifiers are important linguistic elements in Mandarin Chinese that denote units of entities and require congruence with their accompanying nouns, e.g., "yī-zhīCL-niǎo" (one-CL-bird) instead of "*yī-běnCL-niǎo (one-CL-bird)". This study employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how Chinese as a second language (CSL) learners process classifier-noun agreement structures, focusing on two violation conditions: classifier-noun mismatch (Mismatch) and classifier omission (Missing). Native speakers exhibited a combined N300-N400 pattern effect in the Mismatch condition and a P600 effect in the Missing condition. By contrast, CSL learners revealed a distinct pattern: the Mismatch condition elicited a P300 effect rather than an N400, while the Missing condition elicited a native-like P600 effect. These findings suggest that CSL learners may assign greater processing weight to structural cues relative to classifier-specific lexical-semantic cues during online processing of classifier-noun agreement. This pattern is consistent with the cue-based processing assumptions of the Competition Model, which posits that L2 learners may tend to assign more weight to cues with higher availability and reliability during real-time comprehension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: