Retrospective analysis establishes age-specific cut-off values for HbF and HbA2 in children, indicating strong diagnostic potential for thalassemia screening.
To establish age-specific diagnostic cut-off values for HbF and HbA 2 in children under 2 years in Southern Fujian, China, across α-thalassemia group(carriers and patients),β-thalassemia group(carriers), and a negative control group, and evaluate their diagnostic efficacy for precise thalassemia screening. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1,072 children under 2 years old. Participants were divided into α-thalassemia group(carriers and patients,331 samples), β-thalassemia group(carriers,220 samples), α+β-thalassemia group(10 samples), and negative control groups (511 samples), and further stratified into three age groups: 0–6 months (172 samples), 7–12 months (532 samples), and 13–24 months (368 samples). ROC curve analysis determined optimal cut-off values for HbF and HbA 2 , with AUC, sensitivity, and specificity calculated. Normal reference ranges were also analyzed. In the negative control group, mean HbA 2 and HbF varied significantly with age. For β-thalassemia, optimal HbA 2 cut-offs were 2.6% (0–6 months, AUC=0.849, sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 85.9%), 3.15% (7–12 months, AUC=0.979, sensitivity 97.9%, specificity 98.8%), and 3.7% (13–24 months, AUC=0.990, sensitivity 98.9%, specificity 98.7%). Optimal HbF cut-offs were 10.1% (0–6 months, AUC=0.720), 4.75% (7–12 months, AUC=0.920), and 2.35% (13–24 months, AUC=0.931). For α-thalassemia, HbA 2 cut-offs showed limited diagnostic value (AUC ≤0.667). HbF and HbA 2 levels are significantly influenced by age. Age-stratified cut-off values for HbA 2 demonstrate excellent diagnostic efficacy for β-thalassemia and can serve as primary screening indicators. For α-thalassemia, HbA 2 measurement alone is insufficient, highlighting the need for complementary testing methods to improve diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: