Cross-sectional study evaluates knee alignment differences by gender in healthy North Indians, suggesting distinctions in biomechanics.
Introduction: The quadriceps angle (Q-angle) and bicondylar distance (ICD) are physical assessments used for knee alignment. Both parameters provide valuable insights into gender-specific and bilateral variations in knee biomechanics that may influence injury risk, functional performance, and degenerative changes throughout adulthood. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted to evaluate gender-based variations in the Q-angle and ICD of the femur, comprising 600 participants (300 male participants and 300 female participants), aged 20-50 years, of North Indian origin. The Q-angle was measured using a universal 360° manual goniometer, and the ICD of the femur was measured using a digital Vernier caliper in accordance with standard anthropometric measurement procedures. Results: The average age of male participants was 35.4 ± 9.0 years, while that of female participants was 35.5 ± 8.6 years in the study population. Male participants had a slightly higher mean height (164.8 ± 8.2 cm) and mean body weight (66.6 ± 8.5 kg). Female participants demonstrated significantly higher Q-angle values than male participants (16.53± 5.22 vs 13.85 ± 5.32, p < 0.001), whereas the ICD does not show a significant difference between genders (p = 0.083). Within gender groups, significant right-left differences were observed for the Q-angle. Conclusion: The study provides valuable normative data on the Q-angle and ICD in the adult North Indian population. Female participants showed significantly higher Q-angle values than male participants, while the ICD showed no gender related difference, suggesting that Q-angle and ICD parameters represent distinct aspects of knee alignment and independently contribute to knee biomechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: