Longitudinal study investigates mouthguard fit and outcomes in athletes, suggesting objective assessments are crucial for injury prevention.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal changes in fit and user-reported outcomes of custom-made ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguards during 12 months of athletic use, and to explore implications for traumatic dental injury prevention. METHODS: This prospective 12-month longitudinal observational study included 41 athletes using custom-made EVA mouthguards during training and competition. Mouthguard fit was evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months using a validated intraoral silicone weight method. User-reported outcomes were assessed using visual analogue scale questionnaires. Changes over time were analyzed using the Friedman test. RESULTS: Fit-checking material weight increased significantly over time, representing a 48% relative increase at 12 months compared with baseline (p < 0.05), indicating progressive loss of fit. In contrast, most user-reported comfort and function scores showed no significant changes across time points. CONCLUSION: Custom-made EVA mouthguards show progressive fit deterioration over time despite stable user-reported comfort. These findings suggest that subjective perception alone may not accurately reflect changes in mouthguard fit, highlighting the importance of objective fit assessment during routine sports dental care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugimoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: