Compares camera survey methods for estimating Eld’s deer abundance, suggesting best practices for tropical ecosystems.
Accurately estimating population abundance is crucial for conserving endangered ungulates like Eld’s deer ( Rucervus eldii ), yet methodological challenges persist in tropical ecosystems. To evaluate different approaches, we compared two camera-trap-based models – spatial mark-resight (SMR) and the random encounter model (REM) – for estimating Eld’s deer abundance in Hainan Datian National Nature Reserve, China, using the same dataset. Model estimates were also referenced against a preliminary belt transect survey count. From October 2021 to January 2022, we deployed 50 camera traps and utilized GPS data from eight collared deer under a closed-population assumption. The SMR model, incorporating spatial capture-recapture data, yielded a density of 18.45 ± 2.21 deer/km 2 . The REM model yielded a lower density estimate of 6.25 ± 0.11 deer/km 2 . Between the two models, the SMR estimates were similar in magnitude to the belt transect survey results (19.78 ± 0.76 deer/km 2 ). Our analysis indicates that SMR provides more robust estimates when marked individuals are available, whereas REM offers a practical solution for unmarked populations but depends critically on variation in encounter rates among camera stations. This comparison highlights the performance characteristics and parametric sensitivities of both models in a tropical context, highlighting the need for careful method selection based on individual identifiability and parameter availability in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: