Retrospective study compares critical care needs in tree-related trauma before and after Hurricane Helene, highlighting increased resource demand.
Background Following Hurricane Helene, our rural level 1 trauma center in Eastern Tennessee managed a sharp rise in tree-related injuries. We sought to determine whether post-disaster patients required greater inpatient resources than patients injured under baseline conditions, independent of presenting injury severity. Methods This IRB-approved (#0125.12) retrospective study identified adult patients with tree-related injuries from our trauma registry using ICD-10 E codes. We compared a pre-Helene cohort (January 2018-September 26, 2024; n = 176) to a post-Helene cohort (September 27-December 2024; n = 25). Outcomes included ICU admission, ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation, operative intervention, and discharge disposition. Results Post-Helene patients required significantly more intensive care despite presenting with similar injury severity scores and initial physiologic parameters. Mechanical ventilation was needed in 24% of post-Helene patients vs 9.1% pre-Helene (OR 3.16, 95% CI: 1.10-9.04, P = 0.025). ICU length of stay was longer post-Helene (6 days [IQR 3-16] vs 3 days [IQR 2-7], P = 0.036). Discharge to extended care facilities was more frequent (36% vs 15.9%, OR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.20-7.39, P = 0.015). Post-Helene patients also carried a substantially higher burden of cardiopulmonary and renal comorbidities. Conclusion In a rural disaster setting, tree-related trauma patients placed greater demands on critical care, ventilator, and post-acute resources than their initial presentations predicted. Hospital preparedness plans for rural level 1 trauma centers must account for this gap between triage acuity and downstream resource utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: