Autoethnography explores how movement shapes knowledge in rural settings, highlighting embodied experiences.
This paper is an autoethnography of the global countryside that treats rurality as a relational and embodied condition produced through movement between rural worlds. Drawing on ethnographic experience in rural southern Italy and rural Tanzania, I argue that mobility between rural worlds generates forms of knowledge that cannot be captured through single-site methodologies. I advance three main claims: first, the global countryside is not a place but a condition emerging through circulation, comparison and uneven temporalities across rural worlds; second, the researcher’s body functions as both an affective and interpretive epistemic device through which memory, encounter and embodied comparison produce insight; third, autoethnography generates situated knowledge by making visible the embodied and positional conditions through which rural life becomes knowable. The analysis unfolds through four shifting embodied positions – the present body, the absent body, the returning body and the nostalgic body – each revealing different dimensions of rural life structured by migration, memory and moral evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonio Allegretti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: