Randomized trial demonstrates non-inferior safety and efficacy of a novel HA gel in treating nasolabial folds, indicating a significant advancement in facial rejuvenation.
This study evaluates a novel lidocaine-premixed hyaluronic acid (HA) gel for nasolabial fold (NLF) correction, addressing pain management and longevity challenges in facial rejuvenation. The aim is to assess the non-inferiority, efficacy, and safety of this investigational HA gel versus an established comparator. In this multicenter, evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT), 324 Chinese adults with moderate-to-severe NLFs (Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale [WSRS] 3–4) received either test product (22 mg/mL HA + 3 mg/mL lidocaine) or control. The primary endpoint was ≥ 1 grade WSRS improvement at 6 months. The test product showed non-inferiority at 6 months (full analysis set [FAS]: 88.27% versus 85.19%, P = 0.392; per‑protocol set (PPS): 91.45% versus 88.24%, P = 0.363), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) exceeding a −10% margin. Pain scores were comparable at 0.5 h/1 h post-injection ( P > 0.05) but higher at 2 h post-touch-up ( P < 0.05). Adverse event (AE) rates were similar, with induration/swelling being most common. The lidocaine-premixed HA gel is non-inferior for NLF correction, offering similar safety and efficacy with integrated anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: