Cross-sectional audit quantifies hepatitis B and C testing capacity and utilization in Vietnam, revealing systemic inefficiencies.
Background The WHO aims to eliminate hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) as public health threats by 2030, yet diagnosis remains suboptimal in many low- and middle-income countries. Access to diagnostics is often emphasized, but how far existing capacity is used is poorly characterized. We quantified installed capacity and utilization of HBV/HCV testing across three primary-care–linked Vietnamese facilities and described disease stage. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional inventory and utilization audit of serologic (HBsAg, anti-HCV) and molecular (HBV DNA, HCV RNA) testing during 2018–2020 at a private diagnostic network, a public district hospital, and a teaching/research institute. Utilization was tests performed divided by maximum theoretical capacity. Facility-level data on fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at diagnosis were drawn from routine records. Results In 2019 (pre-COVID-19 reference year), serologic and PCR utilization were 50.0% and 18.8% at the private network, 5.0% and 21.3% at the public hospital, and lowest at the teaching institute (3.5% and 3.0%). Advanced fibrosis (≥ F3) rose over 2018–2020 from 11.4% to 16.6% in HBV and 21.6% to 37.5% in HCV. Most HCC occurred in individuals with HBV infection (52.3% and 21.4% at the two larger sites) and coexisted with high unused capacity; we did not assess testing accuracy. Conclusions Substantial HBV/HCV diagnostic infrastructure exists in Vietnam but is unevenly used. Because data were facility-aggregated, these are associations, not patient-level causal relationships. Optimizing use of existing platforms may help address systemic inefficiencies and support elimination efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: