Investigates how distance learning affects educational outcomes in lower secondary students during COVID-19, indicating a nuanced understanding of its impact.
This study investigates how distance learning during COVID-19 affected educational outcomes of lower secondary students in Sweden. In contrast to most previously studied contexts characterized by prolonged and fully remote school closures, Sweden represents a school system with a high level of digital preparedness, in which distance learning was implemented for a limited period, often combined with in-person instruction, and accompanied by exemptions for students with special needs. Using a difference-in-differences design with entropy balancing, we compare pre-pandemic and pandemic-affected cohorts. Our findings suggest that students in schools that adopted remote instruction performed similarly on standardized tests to those in schools that maintained in-person teaching throughout the pandemic. Moreover, progression to upper secondary school was not negatively affected. In some cases, we even find positive effects of remote instruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Häll et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: