Qualitative analysis investigates predictors of students’ perceptions of distance learning, highlighting well-being implications.
COVID-19-related school closures substantially disrupted students’ daily lives. While prior research has predominantly relied on externally assessed achievement data and proxy indicators of well-being, less is known about students’ own perceptions of their experiences during distance learning. This study addresses this gap, using a qualitatively informed quantitative analysis. First, open-ended responses from N = 698 students from German and Swiss schools were analyzed to identify perceived positive and negative aspects of distance learning, thereby providing experience-based indicators of how the pandemic affected students’ well-being. Quantitative content analysis revealed that students most frequently mentioned advantages such as being at home and experiencing greater independence, while common disadvantages included a lack of social contact and insufficient learning support. Second, random forest models were applied to identify individual, contextual, and background-related predictors of these perceptions. Students with stronger self-regulation skills, lower levels of procrastination, and better-equipped home learning environments were more likely to emphasize positive experiences. Conversely, younger students and those with weaker self-regulation and fewer home learning resources more frequently reported negative experiences. The findings reveal substantial variability in students’ perceptions of distance learning, shaped by learner-related, contextual, and broader background factors. They underscore the importance of fostering self-regulation and ensuring equitable access to learning resources to better prepare schools for future crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brauchle et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: